| Criterion | Metrics | QIF | Description | Documents |
| Criteria I Curricualum Aspects (150) | Key Indicator – 1.1 Curriculum Design and Development (50) | 1.1.1 QlM | Curricula developed and implemented have relevance to the local, national, regional and global developmental needs which is reflected in outcomes (POs), Specific Outcomes(PSOs) and Course Outcomes(COs) of the s offered by the University | |
| 1.1.2 QnM | Percentage of s where syllabus revision was carried out during the last five years | |||
| 1.1.3 QnM | Average percentage of courses having focus on employability/ entrepreneurship/ skill development offered by the University | |||
| Key Indicator – 1.2 Academic Flexibility (50) | 1.2.1 QnM | Percentage of new courses introduced of the total number of courses across all programs offered during the last five years | ||
| 1.2.2
QnM |
Percentage of s in which Choice Based Credit System (CBCS)/elective course system has been implemented (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| Key Indicator – 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (30) | 1.3.1
QlM |
Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics ,Gender, Human Values ,Environment and Sustainability into the Curriculum | ||
| 1.3.2
QnM |
Number of value-added courses for imparting transferable and life skills offered during last five years | |||
| 1.3.3 QnM | Average Percentage of students enrolled in the courses under 1.3.2 above | |||
| 1.3.4 QnM | Percentage of students undertaking field projects / research projects / internships (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| Key Indicator 1.4 Feed back System (20) | 1.4.1 QnM | Structured feedback for design and review of syllabus – semester wise / year wise is received from
1) Students, 2) Teachers, 3) Employers, 4) Alumni |
||
| 1.4.2 QnM | Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows: A. Feedback collected, analysed and action taken and feedback available on website B. Feedback collected, analysed and action has been taken C. Feedback collected and analysed D. Feedback collected | |||
| Criterion II – Teaching-Learning and Evaluation (200) | Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (10) | 2.1.1 QnM | Demand Ratio (Average of last five years) | |
| 2.1.2 QnM | Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years (Excluding Supernumerary Seats) | |||
| Key Indicator – 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity (20) | 2.2.1 QLM | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special s for advanced learners and slow learners. | ||
| 2.2.2 QnM | Student – Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching – Learning Process (20) | 2.3.1 QlM | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences | ||
| 2.3.2 QLM | Teachers use ICT enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning processes | |||
| 2.3.3 QnM | Ratio of students to mentor for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year data) | |||
| Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (50) | 2.4.1 QnM | Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years | ||
| 2.4.2 QnM | Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Superspeciality/D.Sc./D’Lit. during the last five years | |||
| 2.4.3 QnM | Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) | |||
| 2.4.4 QnM | Average percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at State, National, International level from Government/Govt. recognised bodies during the last five years | |||
| Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (40) | 2.5.1 QnM | Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years | ||
| 2.5.2 QnM | Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years | |||
| 2.5.3 QLM | IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes (continuous internal assessment and end-semester assessment) have brought in considerable improvement in examination management system of the institution | |||
| 2.5.4 QnM | Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual | |||
| Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (30) | 2.6.1 QlM | The institution has stated learning outcomes (generic and specific)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents | ||
| 2.6.2 QLM | Attainment of outcomes, specific outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution
Describe the method of measuring the level of attainment of POs , PSOs and COs in not more than 500 words. |
|||
| 2.6.3 QnM | Pass percentage of students (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (30) | 2.7.1 QnM | Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process.
( Online survey to be conducted) |
||
| Criterion III – Research, Innovations and Extension (250) | Key Indicator – 3.1 Promotion of Research and Facilities (20) | 3.1.1 QnM | The institution Research facilities are frequently updated and there is well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented | |
| 3.1.2 QnM | The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research (average per year INR in Lakhs) | |||
| 3.1.3 QnM | Percentage of teachers receiving national/ international fellowship/financial support by various agencies for advanced studies/ research during the last five years | |||
| 3.1.4 QnM | Number of JRFs, SRFs, Post Doctoral Fellows, Research Associates and other research fellows enrolled in the institution during the last five years | |||
| 3.1.5 QnM | Institution has the following facilities to support research
1. Central Instrumentation Centre 2. Animal House/Green House 3. Museum 4. Media laboratory/Studios5. Business Lab 6. Research/Statistical Databases 7. Mootcourt 8. Theatre 9. Art Gallery |
|||
| 3.1.6 QnM | Percentage of departments with UGC-SAP, CAS, DST-FIST, DBT, ICSSR and other recognitions by national and international agencies (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| Key Indicator – 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research (20) | 3.2.1 QnM | Extramural funding for Research (Grants sponsored by the non-government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research projects) endowments, Chairs in the University during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | ||
| 3.2.2 QnM | Grants for research projects sponsored by the government agencies during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | |||
| 3.2.3 QnM | Number of research projects per teacher funded by government and non-government agencies during the last five years | |||
| Key Indicator – 3.3 Innovation Ecosystem (30) | 3.3.1 QlM | Institution has created an eco system for innovations including Incubation centre and other initiatives for creation and transfer of knowledge | ||
| 3.3.2 QnM | Number of workshops/seminars conducted on Research methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR),entrepreneurship, skill development during the last five years | |||
| 3.3.3 QnM | Number of awards / recognitions received for research/innovations by the institution/teachers/research scholars/students during the last five years | |||
| Key Indicators – 3.4 Research Publications and Awards (100) | 3.4.1 QnM | The institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research | ||
| 3.4.2 QnM | The institution provides incentives to teachers who receive state, national and international recognitions/awards | |||
| 3.4.3 QnM | Number of Patents published/awarded during the last five years | |||
| 3.4..4 QnM | Number of Ph.D’s awarded per teacher during the last five years | |||
| 3.4.5 | Number of reserch papers per teacher in the journals notified on UGC websitedurng the last five years | |||
| 3.4.6 QnM | Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher during the last five years | |||
| 3.4.7 QnM | E-content is developed by teachers : | |||
| 3.4.8 QnM | Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation Index in Scopus/ Web of Science/PubMed | |||
| 3.4.9 QnM | Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-Index of the University | |||
| Key Indicators – 3.5 Consultancy (20) | 3.5.1 QlM | Institution has a policy on consultancy including revenue sharing between the institution and the individual and encourages its faculty to undertake consultancy | ||
| 3.5.2 QnM | Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | |||
| Key Indicators – 3.6 Extension Activities (40) | 3.6.1 QlM | Extension activities in the neighbourhood community in terms of impact and sensitising students to social issues and holistic development during the last five years | ||
| 3.6.2 QnM | Number of awards received by the Institution, its teachers and students from Government /Government recognised bodies in recognition of the extension activities carried out during the last five years | |||
| 3.6.3 QnM | Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution including those through NSS/NCC/Red cross/YRC during the last five years ( including Government initiated programs such as Swachh Bharat, Aids Awareness, Gender Issue, etc. and those organised in collaboration with industry, community and NGOs) | |||
| 3.6.4 QnM | Average percentage of students participating in extension activities listed at 3.6.3 above during the last five years | |||
| Key Indicator – 3.7 Collaboration (20) | 3.7.1 QnM | Number of collaborative activities with other institutions/ research establishment/industry for research and academic development of faculty and students per year | ||
| 3.7.2 QnM | Number of functional MoUs with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years | |||
| Criterion IV – Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100) | Key indicator 4.1 Physical Facilities (30) | 4.1.1 QlM | The institution has adequate facilities for teaching – learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, computing equipment, etc. | |
| 4.1.2 QlM | The institution has adequate facilities for cultural activities, yoga, games (indoor, outdoor) and sports. (gymnasium, yoga centre, auditorium, etc.) | |||
| 4.1.3 QlM | Availability of general campus facilities and overall ambience | |||
| 4.1.4 QnM | Average percentage of expenditure excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | |||
| Key Indicator – 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource (20) | 4.2.1 QlM | Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS) and has digitisation facility | ||
| 4.2.2 QnM | Institutions has subscription for e library resources | |||
| 4.2.3 QnM | Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/ e-books and subscription to journals/e-journals during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | |||
| 4.2.4 QnM | Percentage per day usage of library by teachers and students ( foot falls and login data for online access) (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| Key Indicator – 4.3 IT Infrastructure (30) | 4.3.1 QnM | Percentage of classrooms and seminar halls with ICT – enabled facilities such as LCD, smart board, Wi-Fi/LAN, audio video recording facilities .(Data for the latest completed academic year) | ||
| 4.3.2 QlM | Institution has an IT policy, makes appropriate budgetary provision and updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi facility | |||
| 4.3.3 QnM | Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | |||
| 4.3.4 QnM | Available bandwidth of internet connection in the Institution (Leased line) | |||
| 4.3.5 QnM | Institution has the following Facilities for e-content development 1. Media centre
2. Audio visual centre 3. Lecture Capturing System(LCS) 4. Mixing equipments and softwares for editing |
|||
| Key Indicator – 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure (20) | 4.4.1 QnM | Average percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component during the last five years | ||
| 4.4.2 QlM | There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilizing physical, academic and support facilities – laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc. | |||
| Criterion V – Student Support and Progression (100) | Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support (30) | 5.1.1 QnM | Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, Government and non-government agencies (NGOs) during the last five years (other than the students receiving scholarships under the government schemes for reserved categories) | |
| 5.1.2 QnM | Average percentage of students benefited by career counseling and guidance for competitive examinations offered by the Institution during the last five years | |||
| 5.1.3 QnM | Following Capacity development and skills enhancement initiatives are taken by the institution
1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene) 4. Awareness of trends in technology |
|||
| 5.1.4 QnM | The Institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases
1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees |
|||
| Key Indicator – 5.2 Student Progression (40) | 5.2.1 QnM | Average percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations during the last five years
(eg: NET/SLET/GATE/GMAT/CAT/GRE/TOEFL/Civil Services/State government examinations) |
||
| 5.2.2 QnM | Average percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years | |||
| 5.2.3 QnM | Percentage of recently graduated students who have progressed to higher education (previous graduating batch) • UG to PG • PG to MPhil • PG to PhD • MPhil to PhD • PhD to Post doctoral | |||
| Key Indicator – 5.3 Student Participation and Activities (20) | 5.3.1 QnM | Number of awards/medals won by students for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at inter-university/state/national/international events (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years | ||
| 5.3.2 QlM | Presence of Student Council and its activities for institutional development and student welfare. | |||
| 5.3.3 QnM | Average number of sports and cultural events / competitions organised by the institution per year | |||
| Key Indicator – 5.4 Alumni Engagement (10) | 5.4.1 QlM | The Alumni Association/Chapters (registered and functional) contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and other support services during the last five years | ||
| 5.4.2 QnM | Alumni contribution during the last five years (INR in lakhs) | |||
| Criterion VI – Governance, Leadership and Management (100) | Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (10) | 6.1.1 QlM | The institution has a clearly stated vision and mission which are reflected in its academic and administrative governance | |
| 6.1.2 QlM | The effective leadership is reflected in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management | |||
| Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (10) | 6.2.1 QnM | The institutional Strategic plan is effectively deployed. | ||
| 6.2.3 QnM | Institution implements e govenance in its areas of operations | |||
| 6.2.2 QlM | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc. | |||
| Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (30) | 6.3.1 QlM | The institution has a performance appraisal system, promotional avenues and effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff
Write description in maximum of 500 words |
||
| 6.3.2 QnM | Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years | |||
| 6.3.3 QnM | Average number of professional development / administrative training s organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff during the last five years | |||
| 6.3.4 QnM | Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development s (FDP)during the last five years
(Professional Development s, Orientation / Induction s, Refresher Course, Short Term Course ) |
|||
| Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (20) | 6.4.1 QnM | Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources | ||
| 6.4.2 QnM | Funds / Grants received from government bodies during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) (INR in Lakhs) | |||
| 6.4.3 QnM | Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) (INR in Lakhs) | |||
| 6.4.4 QnM | Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly | |||
| Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30) | 6.5.1 QlM | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes by constantly reviewing the teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals | ||
| 6.5.2 QnM | Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance
1. Academic Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken 2.Confernces, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4.Orientation on quality issues for teachers and students 5. Participation in NIRF 6.Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA) |
|||
| 6.5.3 QlM | Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle) | |||
| Criterion VII – Institutional Values and Best Practices (100) | Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities (50) | 7.1.1 QlM | Gender Eqauality : Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years. | |
| 7.1.2 QnM | The institutions has facilities for alternate sources of energy anc energy convation measures | |||
| 7.1.3 QlM | Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the following types of degradable and non-degradable waste (within 500 words)
• Solid waste management • Liquid waste management • Biomedical waste management • E-waste management • Waste recycling system • Hazardous chemicals and radioactive waste management |
|||
| 7.1.4 QlM | Water conservation facilities available in the Institution: 1. Rain water harvesting
2. Borewell /Open well recharge 3. Construction of tanks and bunds 4. Waste water recycling 5. Maintenance of water bodies and distribution system in the campus |
|||
| 7.1.5 QLM | Green campus initiatives include (4)
7.1.5.1. The institutional initiatives for greening the campus are as follows:1. Restricted entry of automobiles 2. Use of Bicycles/ Battery powered vehicles 3. Pedestrian Friendly pathways 4. Ban on use of Plastic 5. landscaping with trees and plants |
|||
| 7.1.6 QnM | Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken by the institution (5)
7.1.6.1. The institutional environment and energy initiatives are confirmed through the following 1.Green audit 2. Energy audit 3.Environment audit 4.Clean and green campus recognitions/awards 5. Beyond the campus environmental promotional activities |
|||
| 7.1.7 QnM | The Institution has disabled-friendly, barrier free environment 1. Built environment with ramps/lifts for easy access to classrooms.
2. Disabled-friendly washrooms 3. Signage including tactile path, lights, display boards and signposts 4. Assistive technology and facilities for persons with disabilities ( Divyangjan) accessible website, screen-reading software, mechanized equipment 5. Provision for enquiry and information : Human assistance, reader, scribe, soft copies of reading material, screen reading |
|||
| 7.1.8 QlM | Inclusion and Situatedness: Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic and other diversities (within 500 words). | |||
| 7.1.9 QlM | Human Values and Professional Ethics : Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens | |||
| 7.1.10 QnM | The instituton has a prescribed code of conduct for students ateachers adminstrators and other staff and conducts periodic s in this regards | |||
| 7.1.11 QnM | Institution celebrates / organizes national and international commemorative days, events and festivals | |||
| Key Indicator – 7.2 Best Practices (30) | 7.2.1 QlM | Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual. | ||
| Key Indicator – 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness (20) | 7.3.1 QlM | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words | ||